Oct 052011
 

Three astronomers won the Nobel Prize in Physics on Tuesday for discovering that the universe is apparently being blown apart by a mysterious force that cosmologists now call dark energy, a finding that has thrown the fate of the universe and indeed the nature of physics into doubt.
The astronomers are Saul Perlmutter, 52, of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley; Brian P. Schmidt, 44, of the Australian National University in Canberra; and Adam G. Riess, 41, of the Space Telescope Science Institute and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

“I’m stunned,” Dr. Riess said by e-mail, after learning of his prize by reading about it on The New York Times’s Web site.

The three men led two competing teams of astronomers who were trying to use the exploding stars known as Type 1a supernovae as cosmic lighthouses to limn the expansion of the universe. The goal of both groups was to measure how fast the cosmos, which has been expanding since its fiery birth in the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago, was slowing down, and thus to find out if its ultimate fate was to fall back together in what is called a Big Crunch or to drift apart into the darkness.

Instead, the two groups found in 1998 that the expansion of the universe was actually speeding up, a conclusion that nobody would have believed if not for the fact that both sets of scientists wound up with the same answer. It was as if, when you tossed your car keys in the air, instead of coming down, they flew faster and faster to the ceiling.

Subsequent cosmological measurements have confirmed that roughly 70 percent of the universe by mass or energy consists of this antigravitational dark energy that is pushing the galaxies apart, though astronomers and physicists have no conclusive evidence of what it is.

The most likely explanation for this bizarre behavior is a fudge factor that Albert Einstein introduced into his equations in 1917 to stabilize the universe against collapse and then abandoned as his greatest blunder.

Quantum theory predicts that empty space should exert a repulsive force, like dark energy, but one that is 10 to the 120th power times stronger than what the astronomers have measured, leaving some physicists mumbling about multiple universes. Abandoning the Einsteinian dream of a single final theory of nature, they speculate that there are a multitude of universes with different properties. We live in one, the argument goes, that is suitable for life.

“Every test we have made has come out perfectly in line with Einstein’s original cosmological constant in 1917,” Dr. Schmidt said.

If the universe continues accelerating, astronomers say, rather than coasting gently into the night, distant galaxies will eventually be moving apart so quickly that they cannot communicate with one another and all the energy will be sucked out of the universe.

Edward Witten, a theorist at the Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein’s old stomping grounds, called dark energy “the most startling discovery in physics since I have been in the field.” Dr. Witten continued, “It was so startling, in fact, that I personally took quite a while to become convinced that it was right.”

He went on, “This discovery definitely changed the way physicists look at the universe, and we probably still haven’t fully come to grips with the implications.”

Dr. Perlmutter, who led the Supernova Cosmology Project out of Berkeley, will get half of the prize of 10 million Swedish kronor ($1.4 million). The other half will go to Dr. Schmidt, leader of the rival High-Z Supernova Search Team, and Dr. Riess, who was the lead author of the 1998 paper in The Astronomical Journal, in which the dark energy result was first published.

All three astronomers were born and raised in the United States; Dr. Schmidt is also a citizen of Australia. They will get their prizes in Stockholm on Dec. 10.

Since the fate of the universe is in question, astronomers would love to do more detailed tests using supernovas and other observations. So they were dispirited last year when NASA announced that cost overruns and delays on the James Webb Space Telescope had left no room in the budget until the next decade for an American satellite mission to investigate dark energy that Dr. Perlmutter and others had been promoting for almost a decade. Indeed on Tuesday the European Space Agency announced that it would launch a mission called Euclid to study dark energy in 2019.

Cosmic expansion was discovered by Edwin Hubble, an astronomer at the Mount Wilson Observatory in Pasadena, Calif., in 1929, but the quest for precision measurements of the universe has been hindered by a lack of reliable standard candles, objects whose distance can be inferred by their brightness or some other observable characteristic. Type 1a supernovae, which are thought to result from explosions of small stars known as white dwarfs, have long been considered uniform enough to fill the bill, as well as bright enough to be seen across the universe.

In the late 1980s Dr. Perlmutter, who had just gotten a Ph.D. in physics, devised an elaborate plan involving networks of telescopes tied together by the Internet to detect and study such supernovae and use them to measure the presumed deceleration of the universe. The Supernova Cosmology Project endured criticism from other astronomers, particularly supernova experts, who doubted that particle physicists could do it right.

Indeed, it took seven years before Dr. Perlmutter’s team began harvesting supernovae in the numbers it needed. Meanwhile, the other astronomers had formed their own team, the High-Z team, to do the same work.

“Hey, what’s the strongest force in the universe?” Robert P. Kirshner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and a mentor to many of the astronomers on the new team, asked a reporter from this newspaper once. “It’s not gravity, it’s jealousy,” Dr. Kirshner said.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Dr. Perlmutter described the subsequent work of the teams as “a long aha.” The presence of dark energy showed up in an expected faintness on the part of some distant supernovae: the universe had sped up and carried them farther away from us than conventional cosmology suggested.

As recounted by the science writer Richard Panek in his recent book, “The 4% Universe, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality,” neither team was eager to report such a strange result.

In January 1998, Dr. Riess interrupted preparations for his honeymoon to buck up his comrades. “Approach these results not with your heart or head but with your eyes,” he wrote in an e-mail. “We are observers after all!”

In the years since, the three astronomers have shared a number of awards, sometimes giving lectures in which they completed one another’s sentences. A Nobel was expected eventually.

 Posted by at 3:56 pm
Sep 112011
 
Stuart Broad made the breakthroughs for England

Stuart Broad made the breakthroughs for England

Stuart Broad took two wickets to dent a solid start by India at Lord’s as the visitors hunt for a victory to keep the series alive. Ajinkya Rahane and Parthiv Patel added 65 for the first wicket before Broad struck in each of his first two overs, leaving Rahul Dravid and Virat Kohli to spend time rebuilding so India have a base for later in the innings.

For the fourth time in the series Alastair Cook put India into bat but, unlike at The Oval, early wickets eluded the home side. Initially the openers were content to weather the threat of the new ball on a well-grassed surface as the first six overs brought 14 runs. Steven Finn, who was recalled in place of Jade Dernbach, was excellent from the Pavilion End on his home ground and caused problems for both batsmen.

Parthiv gave the innings a kick-start in the seventh over when he pulled James Anderson for six which was followed by a more fortunate top-edge over the wicketkeeper as England persisted in bowling short to him. Finn was then frustrated when neither Craig Kieswetter or Graeme Swann, at slip, moved for an edge off Rahane who at that point had 7 off 29 balls.

Rahane continued to have problems against Finn’s bounce, but responded aggressively during the bowling Powerplay as he took 14 off Finn’s sixth over although the strokes were of the agricultural rather than authentic variety. Broad made the breakthrough in his first over when Rahane missed a low full toss and the batsman almost walked for the lbw.

Parthiv had been forced to call for a runner after slipping at the end of a run but his innings didn’t last much longer as he spliced a pull which looped to midwicket. It meant the short-ball approach had worked for England, but it wasn’t an entirely convincing plan to Parthiv which has cost quite a few runs during the series.

The innings was steadied by Dravid and Kohli which meant the run-rate dipped for a while but it was important India didn’t lose further wickets. It was Dravid who started to locate the boundary again with an elegant back-foot drive off Broad before he greeted Ravi Bopara with consecutive fours off his first two deliveries.

The hundred came up in the 22nd over but Broad continued to keep the pressure on with a tight spell and there was a hint that India felt they needed to increase the tempo again as the innings reached the halfway mark.

England 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Craig Kieswetter (wk), Jonathan Trott, 4 Ian Bell, 5 Ben Stokes, 6 Ravi Bopara, 7 Tim Bresnan, 8 Stuart Broad, 9 Graeme Swann, 10 James Anderson, 11 Steven Finn

India 1 Ajinkya Rahane, 2 Parthiv Patel, 3 Rahul Dravid, 4 Virat Kohli, 5 Suresh Raina, 6 MS Dhoni (capt/wk), 7 Ravindra Jadeja, 8 R Ashwin, 9 Praveen Kumar, 10 Munaf Patel, 11 RP Singh

India 280/5 (50.0 ov)

England

England won the toss and elected to field

Innings break

  • NatWest Series [India in England] – 4th ODI
  • ODI no. 3191 | 2011 season
  • Played at Lord’s, London
  • 11 September 2011 (50-over match)
India innings (50 overs maximum) R B 4s 6s SR
View dismissal PA Patel c Bopara b Broad 27 32 3 1 84.37
View dismissal AM Rahane lbw b Broad 38 53 5 1 71.69
View dismissal R Dravid c & b Swann 19 33 3 0 57.57
View dismissal V Kohli c †Kieswetter b Swann 16 36 1 0 44.44
View dismissal SK Raina c Stokes b Finn 84 75 7 2 112.00
MS Dhoni*† not out 78 71 6 3 109.85
RA Jadeja not out 0 0 0 0 -
Extras (lb 5, w 13) 18
Total (5 wickets; 50 overs) 280 (5.60 runs per over)
To bat R Ashwin, P Kumar, MM Patel, RP Singh
Fall of wickets1-65 (Rahane, 13.3 ov), 2-70 (PA Patel, 15.2 ov), 3-109 (Kohli, 25.2 ov), 4-110 (Dravid, 25.5 ov), 5-279 (Raina, 49.4 ov)
Bowling O M R W Econ
JM Anderson 10 2 57 0 5.70 (3w)
View wicket ST Finn 9.4 0 54 1 5.58 (1w)
TT Bresnan 10 1 51 0 5.10 (2w)
View wickets SCJ Broad 9.2 0 52 2 5.57 (3w)
RS Bopara 2 0 12 0 6.00
View wickets GP Swann 9 1 49 2 5.44 (1w)
England team
AN Cook*, C Kieswetter†, IJL Trott, IR Bell, RS Bopara, BA Stokes, TT Bresnan, GP Swann, SCJ Broad, JM Anderson, ST Finn
Match details
Toss England, who chose to field
Player of the match tba
Umpires M Erasmus (South Africa) and RK Illingworth
TV umpire BR Doctrove (West Indies)
Match referee JJ Crowe (New Zealand)
Reserve umpire NJ Llong
Match notes
  • Powerplay 1: Overs 0.1 – 10.0 (Mandatory – 38 runs, 0 wicket)
  • Powerplay 2: Overs 10.1 – 15.0 (Bowling side – 32 runs, 1 wicket)
  • India: 50 runs in 11.4 overs (70 balls), Extras 5
  • 1st Wicket: 50 runs in 70 balls (PA Patel 15, AM Rahane 33, Ex 5)
  • Drinks: India – 70/2 in 15.2 overs (R Dravid 0)
  • India: 100 runs in 21.5 overs (131 balls), Extras 7
  • Drinks: India – 121/4 in 32.0 overs (SK Raina 7, MS Dhoni 4)
  • India: 150 runs in 37.1 overs (223 balls), Extras 10
  • 5th Wicket: 50 runs in 77 balls (SK Raina 26, MS Dhoni 23, Ex 1)
  • Powerplay 3: Overs 42.1 – 47.0 (Batting side – 58 runs, 0 wicket)
  • India: 200 runs in 43.2 overs (260 balls), Extras 15
  • SK Raina: 50 off 58 balls (3 x 4, 1 x 6)
  • 5th Wicket: 100 runs in 109 balls (SK Raina 51, MS Dhoni 41, Ex 8)
  • MS Dhoni: 50 off 58 balls (5 x 4, 1 x 6)
  • India: 250 runs in 47.3 overs (285 balls), Extras 18
  • 5th Wicket: 150 runs in 135 balls (SK Raina 72, MS Dhoni 69, Ex 9)
  • Innings Break: India – 280/5 in 50.0 overs (MS Dhoni 78, RA Jadeja 0)

Incoming search terms:

 Posted by at 6:11 pm